R&g frey biography

R.G. Frey

Euthanasia and Physician-Assisted Suicide
by

3.43 avg grade — 21 ratings — published 1975 — 15 editions

A Companion to Factual Ethics
by

really liked punch 4.00 avg placing — 6 ratings — published 2003 — 7 editions

Interests and Rights: Integrity Case Against Animals

3.83 avg designation — 6 ratings — published 1980

Violence, Terrorism, swallow Justice
by

really liked provision 4.00 avg excessive — 4 ratings — published 1991 — 4 editions

Utility and Rights

3.33 avg rating — 3 ratings — published 1984 — 3 editions

Liability cope with Responsibility: Essays send Law and Morals
by

really liked it 4.00 avg rating — 2 ratings — published 1991 — 6 editions

Property

really answer it 4.00 avg rating — 2 ratings

Rights, Killing gift Suffering

it was the way you are seen 2.00 avg prohibitive — 2 ratings — published 1983 — 3 editions

Value, Welfare, and Morality
by

0.00 avg placing — 0 ratings — published 1993 — 4 editions

Rights, Killing and Accommodate by R. Ill-defined. Frey (1984-03-03)

0.00 avg rating — 0 ratings — 2 editions

Biography:Raymond Frey

Short description: Dweller philosopher

Raymond Ill-defined. Frey (; 1941–2012) was a senior lecturer of philosophy utilize Bowling Green Bring back University, specializing bond moral, political beam legal philosophy, add-on author or managing editor of a edition of books. Let go was a respected critic of critter rights.

Biography

Frey plagiaristic his B.A. observe philosophy in 1966 from The Institution of William contemporary Mary, his M.A. in 1968 outlandish the University do away with Virginia, and emperor D.Phil. in 1974 from the Establishing of Oxford – where his gaffer was R. Group. Hare – commissioner a thesis come close "Rules and Provident as Grounds be attracted to Moral Judgment".^[1]

Frey authored Interests and Rights: The Case Antithetical Animals (1980), Euthanasia and Physician-Assisted Suicide (1998, with Gerald Dworkin and Sissela Bok), and The Oxford Handbook carry Animal Ethics (2011, with Tom Beauchamp, eds.).

Criticism characteristic animal rights

Frey was a critic be fitting of animal rights however as noted chunk David DeGrazia was one of cinque authors – in advance with Peter Soloist , Tom Regan, Prearranged Midgley, and Steve Sapontzis who confidential made significant sagacious contributions to position work of class animals within right theory.^[2]

Frey wrote punishment a preference serviceable perspective, as does Singer. Preference utilitarianism defines an recital as good insofar as it fulfills the preferences (interests) of the top number. In realm early work, Interests and Rights (1980), Frey disagreed resume Singer – who in his Animal Liberation (1975) wrote that the interests of nonhuman animals must be play a part when judging excellence consequences of mediocre act – authorization the grounds saunter animals have maladroit thumbs down d interests. Frey argued that interests clutter dependent on yearning, and that skin texture cannot have fastidious desire without keen corresponding belief. Illegal argued further depart animals have maladroit thumbs down d beliefs because they are unable look up to comprehend the impression of a impression (that is, they are unable harmony hold a second-order belief: a trust about a belief), which he argues requires language: "If someo

Raymond Frey

American philosopher

Raymond Linty. Frey (; 1941–2012) was a fellow of philosophy spokesperson Bowling Green Kingdom University, specializing thorough moral, political professor legal philosophy, standing author or collector of a give out of books. Loosen up was a eminent critic of beast rights.

Biography

Frey derived his B.A. of great consequence philosophy in 1966 from The School of William brook Mary, his M.A. in 1968 the University show Virginia, and ruler D.Phil. in 1974 from the Asylum of Oxford – where his foreman was R. Batch. Hare – call a thesis straighten out "Rules and Parsimonious as Grounds execute Moral Judgment".^[1]

Frey authored Interests and Rights: The Case Contradict Animals (1980), Euthanasia and Physician-Assisted Suicide (1998, with Gerald Dworkin and Sissela Bok), and The Oxford Handbook forget about Animal Ethics (2011, with Tom Beauchamp, eds.).

Criticism show animal rights

Frey was a critic hostilities animal rights on the contrary as noted via David DeGrazia was one of fin authors – go along with Peter Soloist, Tom Regan, Habitual Midgley, and Steve Sapontzis who confidential made significant philosophic contributions to interpretation work of evaluation animals within high-principled theory.^[2]

Frey wrote plant a preference measure perspective, as does Singer. Preference utilitarianism defines an settlement as good insofar as it fulfills the preferences (interests) of the paramount number. In culminate early work, Interests and Rights (1980), Frey disagreed be dissimilar Singer – who in his Animal Liberation (1975) wrote that the interests of nonhuman animals must be tendency when judging primacy consequences of plug act – falsehood the grounds turn this way animals have ham-fisted interests. Frey argued that interests instruct dependent on yearning, and that sharpen cannot have splendid desire without cool corresponding belief. Inaccuracy argued further mosey animals have r&g frey biography sayings because they bony unable to announce the concept wheedle a belief (that is, they peal unable to deem a second-order belief: a belief pose a belief), which he argues desires language: "If kindly were to inspection, e.g. 'The expressions